The Republicans have chosen to defend against Gov. Palin's inexperience by touting two primary roles she has played during her relatively short political career: 1) her executive experience as a small town manager, her mayorship of a slightly larger town, and her Governorship of a state with a population of less than 700,000; and 2) her role as Commander-in-Chief of the Alaskan National Guard.
The problem is that these roles perhaps to do more to highlight the limitations of her experience than to suggest that she is qualified to be President. For instance, the Alaskan Army National guard has less than 2,000 members. A regional manager for Target or Walmart probably has more people under their control than the Commander-in-Chief of the Alaskan National Guard. Of course the rejoinder from our clever friends across the aisle will be "well that's more than BoBama has..." Hardly.
The National Guard is primarily controlled by the Pentagon not the Governor's office. While a Governor has certain authority and control over the National Guard, it is extremely limited. I was just watching one of McCain's spokesmen being grilled on this issue and he could not answer the very simply question of "identify a single executive decision Governor Palin has made in regards to the National Guard." He couldn't. Undoubtedly there are some decisions the Governor has made, but it is wholly disingenuous to suggest that her exceedingly limited experience as Commander of a small military unit primarily controlled by Washington somehow qualifies her in any substantive way to assume the duties of the Presidency. Being a town manager and then a mayor of towns with populations in the area of 6,000 people - while important to the people of those towns - is of almost laughing irrelevancy here.
Has she lived overseas? Studied abroad? Hosted a foreign exchange student in her home? Volunteered to help the poor? I would find all of those things to be of more value than town manager and commander of a
battalion of part time soldiers. Does she have an advanced degree in law, history, economics or business? No she has a Bachelors in Communications. No disrespect to the holders of such degrees but honestly, do you feel qualified to be President, and wouldn't you admit you had class mates who squarely fit some of the negative stereotypes associated with that degree?
Would I prefer Barack had more foreign policy experience? Yes. But he has lived overseas, studied overseas, is a member of the Foreign Relations Committee of the U.S. Senate and was a State Representative in a State with a population almost 19 times that of Alaska -- the home of one of the World's major economic and trading cities. Besides, his domestic experience is unrivaled in this election and he already got the single largest foreign policy issue of this decade right when he voted against the war in Iraq. Not only did everyone else get it wrong, but McCain has an almost irrational insistence on staying the course.
Lastly, a brief point on Gov. Palin's family. I generally agree that one's personal and family lives should not be placed under the microscope. This is especially true when we are talking about a candidates' children. And I think Barack was very right to unequivocally say that the candidates' families, especially their children are off limits. However, with that said, there are some relevant and important points to consider, which Gov. Palin and the McCain campaign themselves have put in play. I stress that I aim these comments at Gov. Palin, not her children.
First, Gov. Palin is proudly supporting her son's deployment to Iraq. Now, I understand when your child has made that decision and is about to go in harm's way, they need and deserve your support. But did Gov. Palin support this choice from the beginning? Did she just stand back and let her son sign up to join in the fight of what ultimately was an illegal and immoral war? If you agree that the Iraq war is wrong and that the civilian leadership of our military has acted in an irresponsible and immoral way, then does Gov. Palin deserve your support because she is proudly sending her son off to that war? [we can debate later the many differences in the case of Beau Biden, starting with Sen. Biden's wish his son wasn't going].
Secondly, the Governor's family values credentials. I wish her pregnant daughter the very best. This is a very difficult time for her even if the whole world wasn't suddenly watching your every move. However, this does deserve some examination. Not with respect to the daughter, but with respect to the way Gov. Palin has raised her family, the values she has instilled, the judgment skills she has passed on to her children, and the attention she has paid to the development of her children. She is touted as returning to work three days after the birth of her fifth child with Down's syndrome. Three-days! It is lauded as a sign of her devotion to duty and the People of Alaska. A noble act. But what about her duty and devotion to her family??? I am sorry, I am the father of two boys, and I take issue with how noble it is for a mom to return to work just three days after the birth of a baby, let alone a baby with Down's syndrome, who are often born with severe complications. It is one thing when you have no choice because you have to return to work or face the loss of your job - though Clinton's Family Medical Leave Act saves most families from making this decision [a nugget to keep in the back of your mind the next time Republicans talk about family values]. But Gov. Palin faced no such dilemma. Alaska had its Lieutenant Gov. holding the reigns; she could have taken the time. Contrast this with Biden's complete willingness to give up the U.S. Senate and not move from his son's hospital bed after the tragic loss of his wife and daughter. For that matter, consider her decision to accept the Vice President nomination knowing full well that her teenage daughter would now come under intense scrutiny. This starts to make you wonder what other decisions has Gov. Palin made - or failed to make - regarding her family?
I normally wouldn't bring this up -- few families are perfect and I wouldn't suggest mine qualifies as one of them [though my boys are awesome]. But Gov. Palin was introduced to us as a leader with strong family value credentials. Her selection as McCain's running mate was specifically intended to suggest to us that one reason we should consider voting for a McCain/Palin ticket was that they best represented what American Family Values was all about. Now, however, as we begin to examine her a bit more closely, I don't buy it and suggest neither should you.
To me this is an issue about McCain's leadership and decision making. It now turns out that his campaign did a very brief background check and vetting of Gov. Palin [a three hour interview and a 70 question test is nothing, let me take her deposition for six hours and then we'd know something]. And when the campaign is very legitimately asked to defend its vetting process, and a McCain spokesman is challenged directly to identify what key decisions Gov. Palin has made in regards to the National Guard -- whoa -- the "liberal media" is accused of engaging in making up scandals and perpetrating a sexist attack against the governor. Please. Stop the drama. Answer the question if you can. And if you can't then why should we believe you?